Congressional Research Service

« Back to Glossary Index

**History and Evolution of Congressional Research Service (CRS):**
– CRS was founded in 1914 by Senator Robert La Follette Sr. and Representative John M. Nelson.
– It was initially modeled after the Wisconsin Legislative Reference Bureau and became the Legislative Reference Service in 1946.
– Renamed under the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1970.
– CRS reports became available to the public in 2018.

**Mission and Services of Congressional Research Service (CRS):**
– CRS provides research and analysis on national policy issues.
– Offers confidential assistance to Members and committees without making legislative recommendations.
– Ensures Members have accurate information for policy decisions.
– Offers courses and seminars for Members and staff.
– Provides responses to Congressional requests, analysis on emerging issues, and assistance in legislative processes.

**Organization and Functions of Congressional Research Service (CRS):**
– Divided into six research divisions covering a wide range of policy areas.
– Supported by infrastructure offices and subject specialist sections.
– Supports legislators in various stages of the legislative process, from preliminary research to public hearings.
– Clarifies parliamentary procedures and contributes to conference committees.
– Prepares nonpartisan summaries of bills and maintains historical legislative information.

**Budget, Staff, and Reports of Congressional Research Service (CRS):**
– Appropriated a budget of $133.6 million in 2023 with roughly 600 experts employed.
– Produces over 700 new reports annually, with nearly 7,800 reports existing by the end of 2011.
– Types of reports include Issue Briefs, Research Memos, and Reports.
– CRS reports are now accessible to the public through the official US Congress website.

**Challenges and Debates Surrounding Congressional Research Service (CRS) Reports:**
– Various attempts have been made to make CRS reports publicly available.
– Concerns about copyright infringement, confidentiality, and potential litigation have been raised.
– Responses to a 1997 CRS memorandum highlighted legal issues and risks associated with public release.
– Arguments for and against the public release of CRS reports have sparked debates among experts and lawmakers.

« Back to Glossary Index